<!-- Begin meta tags generated by ORblogs --> </meta name="keywords" content="progressive, liberal, politics, government, edit, language, grammar, accuracy, honesty, clarity, world, news, media" /> </> <!-- End meta tags generated by ORblogs -->> Editor at Large: THIS didn't get a lot of airplay

Friday, November 12, 2004

THIS didn't get a lot of airplay

Diebold actually got nailed for voting machine improprieties in California. The lawsuit addressed concerns over the security of the systems and their ability to accurately record votes. The terms of the $2.6 million settlement require Diebold to pay for alternative voting machines that had to be used where the electronic voting machines were disallowed; pay for backup measures in certain counties where the vote tally is questioned; pay for increased memory for the voting systems in certain counties; and make a number of changes to the voting systems to improve their security.

Now let's hear from all the other states that used the machines...



Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home