<!-- Begin meta tags generated by ORblogs --> </meta name="keywords" content="progressive, liberal, politics, government, edit, language, grammar, accuracy, honesty, clarity, world, news, media" /> </> <!-- End meta tags generated by ORblogs -->> Editor at Large: Apology not accepted

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Apology not accepted


Last Thursday, in a moment of frustration over Bush's veto of S-CHIP, Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA) pissed off House Republicans when he said to them:

“You don’t have money to fund the war or children. But you’re going to spend it to blow up innocent people, if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president’s amusement.”

Predictably, House Republicans responded with a call for censuring Mr. Stark - which went down in flames today in a 196 to 173 vote.

Still, for some reason, Stark felt the need to apologize:

“I want to apologize to, first of all, my colleagues, many of whom I’ve offended; the president, his family; to the troops...I do apologize. I hope that with this apology I will become as insignificant as I should be, and that we can return to the issues that do divide us, but that we can resolve in a better fashion."

But why should Stark be censured, and why should he apologize? All he did was express how he felt - how millions of Americans feel - about the war and about health care for children (which appear to be mutually exclusive, when it comes to funding). Whom, exactly, did he offend?

Sorry, Mr. Stark - apology not accepted. Because it was unnecessary. Get back in there and keep fighting for children's health care, and next time, don't back down.

3 Comments:

Blogger The Crater Lake Hermit said...

“You don’t have money to fund the war or children. But you’re going to spend it to blow up innocent people, if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president’s amusement.”

This is probably the most truthful statement I have ever heard from a politician. I absolutely believe that George W. Bush kills thousands of our brave soldiers and millions of innocent civilian in Iraq to satisfy his ego and for his personal pleasure. And, since Rep. Pete Stark was telling the truth he never should have apologized for that statement.

5:36 PM  
Blogger crallspace said...

Wonder how PEte "I won't touch impeachment but will vote to condemn MoveON" DiFazio voted.

I agree- no apology necessary, except for backpeddling one of few genuinely refelective statements.

10:54 AM  
Blogger Editor at Large said...

Hermit: We agree wholeheartedly. Truth = no apology necessary.

Crall: When WILL the Democrats stop apologizing for being right?

1:06 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home