Jon Stewart explains Israel's "strategy"
Priceless. http://www.salon.com/ent/video_dog/latenight/2006/07/20/
mideast_crisis/index.html
mideast_crisis/index.html
posted by Editor at Large at 9:11 AM
Friday, July 21, 2006
Previous Posts
- This ought to be good
- The Decider vetoes his first bill
- How are things going with "Operation Enduring Free...
- Dan Quayle walks out on John Mellencamp
- Designers refuse breakfast with Laura Bush
- Woman finds 20 garter snakes in her car
- Bush: "Israel has a right to defend herself"
- Valerie Plame suing Cheney, Rove, and Libby
- "Pro-life" blog quotes Onion article as if it's se...
- The four most overpaid White House staffers
5 Comments:
Priceless? More like worthless.
Yet, it is the liberal mind that can joke about a democracy fighting a terrorist entity - one even Arabs want to see removed.
The only ones that wish to see Hezbollah survive, the ones that want to see the fight against this group restrained - are the morally bankrupt liberals, the UN, and the terrorists themselves.
Somewhere in that pile is your diplomat-wanna-be Jon Stewart.
Justadog... every time you write something, you prove your total lack of intellect. Seriously.
You, a Bush supporting goof, have the nerve to call liberals morally bankrupt? Where are these pure morals from the conservatives? Actions speak louder than words, and the world watches and waits for your president to act out any of the morals he claims to have.
Funny clip, EAL.
Justadog: Whoever said anything about wanting Hezbollah to survive? Stewart was merely pointing out how Israel's knee-jerk, scattershot reaction to Hezbollah's actions might have been handled more precisely - and with less "collateral damage."
Crall: As a right-wing fundamentalist, Bush doesn't actually have to HAVE any morals, as long as he simply professes to BE moral. Neat, huh?
You just don't get Stewart. He's pointing out what the rest of the world already knows, the response is NOT proportional, and not aimed at freeing hostages.
Post a Comment
<< Home